Search for: All records

Two decades of onshore-offshore, ocean bottom seismometer and marine multi-channel seismic data are integrated to constrain the crustal structure of the entire Hikurangi subduction zone. Our method provides refined 3-D constraints on the width and properties of the frontal prism, the thickness and geological architecture of the forearc crust, and the crustal structure and geometry of the subducting Hikurangi Plateau to 40 km depth. Our results reveal significant along-strike changes in the distribution of rigid crustal rocks in the overthrusting plate and along-strike changes in the crustal thickness of the subducting Hikurangi Plateau. We also provide regional constraints on seismic structure in the vicinity of the subduction interface. In this presentation, we will describe our observations and integrate our tomographic model with residual gravity anomalies, onshore geology, and geodetic observations to describe the relationship between crustal structure and fault-slip behavior along the Hikurangi margin. 

Abstract Earth's surface topography/bathymetry and gravity fields provide important constraints on crustal structure and the tectonic processes that act on it due, for example, to plate flexure and mantle convection. Such studies require, however, high accuracy measurements at a wide range of spatial scales. During the past few decades much progress has been made in the acquisition of bathymetry and gravity data using both shipboard and satellite altimeter methods. Surprisingly, there have been few comparisons of these data. During April–June, 2019 we had the opportunity onboard a R/VMarcus G. Langsethcruise in the northwest Pacific Ocean to compare data acquired with an EM122 Kongsberg swath bathymetry system and a refurbished Bell Aerospace BGM‐3 gravimeter with the most recent global bathymetry and gravity fields. We find that while the recovery of bathymetry and gravity from satellite radar altimeter data in areas of sparse shipboard data has been impressive, root mean square discrepancies in the range 175.5–303.4 m and 2.6–6.3 mGal exist between shipboard and satellite‐derived data. While these discrepancies are small, they are highly correlated and therefore have implications for the density structure, rock type and geological processes occurring on the deep seafloor. Shipboard data should continue to be acquired, especially over features such as seamounts, banks, and ridges that are associated with short wavelength (<25 km wavelength) bathymetric and gravimetric features beyond that is recoverable in satellite‐derived data.